aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cores/arduino
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'cores/arduino')
-rw-r--r--cores/arduino/new.cpp37
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/cores/arduino/new.cpp b/cores/arduino/new.cpp
index 1683594..19d80b6 100644
--- a/cores/arduino/new.cpp
+++ b/cores/arduino/new.cpp
@@ -18,26 +18,61 @@
#include "new.h"
+// The C++ spec dicates that allocation failure should cause the
+// (non-nothrow version of the) operator new to throw an exception.
+// Since we expect to have exceptions disabled, it would be more
+// appropriate (and probably standards-compliant) to terminate instead.
+// Historically failure causes null to be returned, but this define
+// allows switching to more robust terminating behaviour (that might
+// become the default at some point in the future). Note that any code
+// that wants null to be returned can (and should) use the nothrow
+// versions of the new statement anyway and is unaffected by this.
+// #define NEW_TERMINATES_ON_FAILURE
+
namespace std {
+ // Defined in abi.cpp
+ void terminate();
+
const nothrow_t nothrow;
}
-void * operator new(size_t size) {
+static void * new_helper(size_t size) {
// Even zero-sized allocations should return a unique pointer, but
// malloc does not guarantee this
if (size == 0)
size = 1;
return malloc(size);
}
+
+void * operator new(size_t size) {
+ void *res = new_helper(size);
+#if defined(NEW_TERMINATES_ON_FAILURE)
+ if (!res)
+ std::terminate();
+#endif
+ return res;
+}
void * operator new[](size_t size) {
return operator new(size);
}
void * operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t tag) noexcept {
+#if defined(NEW_TERMINATES_ON_FAILURE)
+ // Cannot call throwing operator new as standard suggests, so call
+ // new_helper directly then
+ return new_helper(size);
+#else
return operator new(size);
+#endif
}
void * operator new[](size_t size, const std::nothrow_t& tag) noexcept {
+#if defined(NEW_TERMINATES_ON_FAILURE)
+ // Cannot call throwing operator new[] as standard suggests, so call
+ // malloc directly then
+ return new_helper(size);
+#else
return operator new[](size);
+#endif
}
void * operator new(size_t size, void *place) noexcept {