From 45b5aa3ebb2168e19441167ec4740f34389dae26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthijs Kooijman Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:37:09 +0100 Subject: In HardwareSerial::_rx_complete_irq, don't use int for buffer index This was already fixed for HardwareSerial.cpp in #1863, but there was one more case hidden in HardwareSerial_private.h. The index attributes have been uint8_t for a while, so there is no point in using int for local variables. This should allow the compiler to generate slightly more efficient code, but (at least on gcc 4.8.2) it also confuses the register allocator, causing this change to increase code size by 2 bytes instead due to extra push/pop instructions (but this will probably change in the future if the compiler improves). --- cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h') diff --git a/cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h b/cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h index 915d7a1..fa20e55 100644 --- a/cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h +++ b/cores/arduino/HardwareSerial_private.h @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ void HardwareSerial::_rx_complete_irq(void) // No Parity error, read byte and store it in the buffer if there is // room unsigned char c = *_udr; - int i = (unsigned int)(_rx_buffer_head + 1) % SERIAL_BUFFER_SIZE; + uint8_t i = (unsigned int)(_rx_buffer_head + 1) % SERIAL_BUFFER_SIZE; // if we should be storing the received character into the location // just before the tail (meaning that the head would advance to the -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258